Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA logo with link NPA logo with link

About this NPA

The Other Federal Jurisdiction National Practice Area (NPA) encompasses cases that do not readily fit into any of the Court’s eight subject-matter NPAs.

Jurisdiction of the Court  

The jurisdiction of the Court is described in the About Us section of the website. See further, the Resources section below.

The relationship between the eight subject-matter NPAs and the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA

The eight subject-matter NPAs do not exhaust the jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia. They are the main bodies of work of the Court. Many other matters may, however, be brought in the Court that do not conveniently fit into these NPAs.

This NPA is designed to encompass cases that do not readily fit into any of the other existing NPAs. For instance, cases may arise under a law of the parliament (s 39B(1A)(c)) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) or otherwise in federal jurisdiction that is conferred on the Court such as cases that are in substance negligence claims for damages (such as under legislation governing civil aviation), or defamation, or cases involving the Court acting as a Court of disputed returns. This list is not by any means exhaustive. If the Court has jurisdiction but the matter does not fall within one of the eight NPAs, the matter will be managed within this NPA.

Allocation of matters in this NPA

Under this NPA, depending on the specialised nature of the subject matter, an allocation will be made under the existing protocols for allocation.

The Court will ensure that the judge allocated to manage a case falling within this NPA has particular expertise in the underlying areas of law in the subject of the proceeding.

Areas of law within this NPA

  • Defamation Sub-area: The Defamation Sub-area is a Sub-area within the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA and covers all manner of defamation disputes within federal jurisdiction, including defamation cases that may arise under a law of the Parliament (s 39B(1A)(c) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)). 

By way of illustration, other types of claims that are likely to fall within this NPA include:

Latest Judgments

  • 28 Oct 2020: Muto v Janover [2020] FCA 1579
    APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL - appeal from Federal Circuit Court - sole ground of appeal - whether primary judge erred by not allowing the appellant to have legal assistance or a legal guardian in the Federal Circuit Court - necessary for appellant to demonstrate error in the primary judge's findings or conclusion - no error demonstrated - appeal dismissed
    Judge: Anderson J
  • 23 Oct 2020: Dispute Resolution Associates Pty Ltd v Selth (No 3) [2020] FCA 1554
    COSTS - interlocutory application for extension of time and leave to appeal - whether costs should follow the event.
    Judge: Collier J
  • 16 Oct 2020: Arnold Bloch Leibler (A Firm) v Slater & Gordon Limited [2020] FCA 1496
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - discovery - implied waiver of legal professional privilege - whether former client's past conduct in producing documents to a third party is inconsistent with the maintenance of confidentiality - where former client refused to grant consent to lawyer to use confidential information for defence of proceedings - where Court…
    Judge: Middleton J
  • 14 Oct 2020: Parke v Rubenstein [2020] FCA 1466
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE -- Interlocutory application for an order giving effect to the applicant's acceptance of an offer made by the third respondent pursuant to rule 25.01 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) -- where the applicant had previously rejected the offer before then accepting it within the timeframe set out in the Notice of offer to…
    Judge: Besanko J
  • 12 Oct 2020: Hafertepen v Network Ten Pty Limited [2020] FCA 1456
    HIGH COURT AND FEDERAL COURT -- jurisdiction -- whether contract to settle a proceeding within the jurisdiction of the Court and between the same parties to the original proceeding can be enforced in the Court -- where proceeding dismissed in accordance with one of the terms of settlement, whether contract capable of enforcement in the original…
    Judge: Katzmann J

Practice Notes

Due to the broad nature of this NPA, practice notes within the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA will be developed as necessary. The Defamation Sub-area has a dedicated practice note:

Parties should also be familiar with the guiding case management principles in the Central Practice Note (CPN-1).

To the extent relevant, parties should also be familiar with the general practice notes of the Court, including:

Forms, Rules & Fees

Due to the potentially broad range of actions relevant to this NPA it is impractical to provide an exhaustive list of forms and rules. However, below are some of the potentially relevant forms and rules for some proceedings commenced in this NPA:


Parties should consider whether it is necessary to file a Genuine Steps Statement (Form 16) in certain proceedings in this NPA – see r 8.02 of the Federal Court Rules and the Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth) (including sections 6, 7 and 16).

Filing fees for commencing a proceeding in this NPA may apply. Information about Court fees, including the fees payable and circumstances where an exemption or deferral can be given is available in Forms, Fees & Costs or from the Registry.


The following resources may be of assistance in the respect of the subject of the jurisdiction of the Federal Court:


To stay up-to-date with news in the Federal Court, including developments in this NPA, subscribe to our email subscription services.

We provide subscriptions to the latest judgments and events (by NPA); Practice News to keep up-to-date with changes to practice and procedure; and Daily Court Listings.

All Subscriptions