Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA logo with link NPA logo with link

About this NPA

The Other Federal Jurisdiction National Practice Area (NPA) encompasses cases that do not readily fit into any of the Court’s eight subject-matter NPAs.

Jurisdiction of the Court  

The jurisdiction of the Court is described in the About Us section of the website. See further, the Resources section below.

The relationship between the eight subject-matter NPAs and the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA

The eight subject-matter NPAs do not exhaust the jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia. They are the main bodies of work of the Court. Many other matters may, however, be brought in the Court that do not conveniently fit into these NPAs.

This NPA is designed to encompass cases that do not readily fit into any of the other existing NPAs. For instance, cases may arise under a law of the parliament (s 39B(1A)(c)) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) or otherwise in federal jurisdiction that is conferred on the Court such as cases that are in substance negligence claims for damages (such as under legislation governing civil aviation), or defamation, or cases involving the Court acting as a Court of disputed returns. This list is not by any means exhaustive. If the Court has jurisdiction but the matter does not fall within one of the eight NPAs, the matter will be managed within this NPA.

Allocation of matters in this NPA

Under this NPA, depending on the specialised nature of the subject matter, an allocation will be made under the existing protocols for allocation.

The Court will ensure that the judge allocated to manage a case falling within this NPA has particular expertise in the underlying areas of law in the subject of the proceeding.

Areas of law within this NPA

  • Defamation Sub-area: The Defamation Sub-area is a Sub-area within the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA and covers all manner of defamation disputes within federal jurisdiction, including defamation cases that may arise under a law of the Parliament (s 39B(1A)(c) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)). 

By way of illustration, other types of claims that are likely to fall within this NPA include:

Latest Judgments

  • 28 Jul 2020: Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 5) [2020] FCA 1067
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - interlocutory application to amend defence in three defamation proceedings - where respondents plead a defence of justification and a defence of contextual truth pursuant to s 25 and 26 of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) respectively - where proposed amendments relate to particulars of truth - consideration of the nature and …
    Judge: Besanko J
  • 15 Jul 2020: Australian Communications and Media Authority v Red Telecom Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 996
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Application for judgment in default by reason of non-compliance with Court order - self-executing orders made
    Judge: Perry J
  • 2 Jul 2020: Nationwide News Pty Limited v Rush [2020] FCAFC 115
    DEFAMATION - appeal from judgment in respect of three publications found to be seriously defamatory - seven separate defamatory imputations - award of damages including interest totalling $2,872,753.10 - on appeal, apprehension of bias grounds wholly abandoned - whether the primary Judge erred in finding that two of the publications conveyed one…
    Judge: White, Gleeson and Wheelahan JJ
  • 17 Jun 2020: Dispute Resolution Associates Pty Ltd v Selth (No 2) [2020] FCA 844
    COSTS - application for extension of time and leave to appeal from dismissal of application for extension of time within which to object to estimate of costs - r 40.20 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) - delay - whether adequate explanation for delay - where applicants claimed facts not within knowledge - where applicants made request for action from …
    Judge: Collier J
  • 5 Jun 2020: Igoe v Major General Michael Ryan AM in his capacity as a Reviewing Authority [2020] FCA 789
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - interlocutory injunction - ex parte hearing - sentence of imprisonment for 35 days of Australian Defence Force Academy cadet - whether serious question to be tried in respect of decisions of service tribunals under Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 (Cth) - s 39B Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) - whether injury for which damages…
    Judge: Collier J

Practice Notes

Due to the broad nature of this NPA, practice notes within the Other Federal Jurisdiction NPA will be developed as necessary. The Defamation Sub-area has a dedicated practice note:

Parties should also be familiar with the guiding case management principles in the Central Practice Note (CPN-1).

To the extent relevant, parties should also be familiar with the general practice notes of the Court, including:

Forms, Rules & Fees

Due to the potentially broad range of actions relevant to this NPA it is impractical to provide an exhaustive list of forms and rules. However, below are some of the potentially relevant forms and rules for some proceedings commenced in this NPA:


Parties should consider whether it is necessary to file a Genuine Steps Statement (Form 16) in certain proceedings in this NPA – see r 8.02 of the Federal Court Rules and the Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth) (including sections 6, 7 and 16).

Filing fees for commencing a proceeding in this NPA may apply. Information about Court fees, including the fees payable and circumstances where an exemption or deferral can be given is available in Forms, Fees & Costs or from the Registry.


The following resources may be of assistance in the respect of the subject of the jurisdiction of the Federal Court:


To stay up-to-date with news in the Federal Court, including developments in this NPA, subscribe to our email subscription services.

We provide subscriptions to the latest judgments and events (by NPA); Practice News to keep up-to-date with changes to practice and procedure; and Daily Court Listings.

All Subscriptions